Orraca v. Walker

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• dismissing petition where three claims had “not been addressed in state courts and... the parties will need to make a record as to some of the claims”
• articulating “nonmeritorious” standard rather than “patently frivolous,” although claims failed either standard
• articulating “nonmeritorious” standard rather than “patently frivolous,” although claims failed either standard
• articulating “nonmeritorious” standard rather than “patently frivolous,” although claims failed either standard
• articulating “nonmeritorious” standard rather than “patently frivolous,” although claims failed either standard

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).