Orr v. Clyburn

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Title VII cases “are certainly persuasive if not controlling in construing the [SCHAL]”
• noting that the SCHAL \essentially follows the substantive structure of Title VII” and that cases interpreting Title VII are \certainly persuasive if not controlling in construing the [SCHAL]”
• recognizing a private right of action under section 1-13-90(d) of the SCHAL
• noting SCHAL essentially follows the substantive structure of Title VII and that cases interpreting Title VII are given persuasive if not binding authority
• noting the plaintiff's complaint lists SCHAL as one of the statutes under which he is pursuing his claim
• “Under general rules of statutory construction, a jurisdiction adopting legislation from another jurisdiction imports with it the judicial gloss interpreting that legislation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).