Skip to main content
· 12/17/1997

Orr v. City of Eugene

Citations

  • 950 P.2d 397
  • 151 Or. App. 541
  • 1997 Ore. App. LEXIS 1893

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting implication of statutory term where exploration of other statutes discloses that legislature knows how to unambiguously express such a term
  • rejecting implication of statutory term where exploration of other statutes discloses that legislature knows how to unambiguously express such a term
  • “The requirement that notice be given timely is a substantive condition precedent to recovery under the Oregon Tort Claims Act that, if not satisfied, deprives a plaintiff of the right to make a claim.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Riggs, Landau, Leeson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.