Skip to main content
· 10/5/2023

Oroville Dam Cases

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • further study of alternatives not required unless plaintiff is prepared to show that a plausible alternative site was overlooked
  • further study of alternatives not required unless plaintiff is prepared to show that a plausible alternative site was overlooked
  • “This requirement is independent of the question of environmental impact statements, and operative even if the agency finds no impact.... For nonsignificant impact does not equal no impact; so if an even less harmful alternative is feasible, it ought to be considered.”
  • “[aesthetic values do not lend themselves to measurement or elaborate analysis”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.