O'Rourke v. Geist

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• fact that plaintiffs duties were taken over by individuals 13 and 26 years younger supports inference of discrimination
• defendants never argued at trial that there was a third motive for their actions so there-was no basis for the jury to conclude that there was any motivation for the pretext other than discrimination

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).