O'ROURKE v. Crosley

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the Sabolsky court did not adopt a restrictive standard and that futility may serve as an exception to the “request” requirement
• “[T]he allegation that a union discriminated against a dissident member by refusing to refer him for employment states a claim for breach of the duty of fair representation that is cognizable in federal court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).