O'Rourke on Behalf of O'Rourke v. Rao

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that “the witness must be within the control of the party in whose interest it would naturally be to produce him. Absent a showing of the witness’ unavailability to the party seeking the inference, no inference can be taken.”
• observing that “the witness must be within the control of the party in whose interest it would naturally be to produce him. Absent a showing of the witness’ unavailability to the party seeking the inference, no inference can be taken.”
• observing that “the witness must be within the control of the party in whose interest it would naturally be to produce him. Absent a showing of the witness' unavailability to the party seeking the inference, no inference can be taken.” (citations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).