Ormsbee v. Allstate Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an umbrella policy is an automobile liability policy for purposes of Arizona UM statute
• holding that UM/UIM statute included umbrella policies where, despite reference to “automobile liability or motor vehicle liability policy,” it made “no mention of primary coverage”
• holding that an umbrella policy is an automobile liability policy for purposes of Arizona UM statute
• holding that “[b]ecause the [Arizona] statute links the amount of uninsured/underinsured coverage to the amount of liability coverage, it makes sense that, as the latter increases, as through umbrella polices, the former must also increase”
• Finding umbrella policy within the statute; “Because the statute links the amount of uninsured/underinsured coverage to the amount of liability coverage, it makes sense that, as the latter increases, as through umbrella policies, the former must also increase”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).