Skip to main content
· 12/23/2003

Orloff v. Federal Communications Commission

Citations

  • 352 F.3d 415
  • 359 U.S. App. D.C. 132
  • 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 26163
  • 2003 WL 22997793

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that post-detariffing, the legality of a telecommunications carrier’s terms of service “depends not on the company’s designation as a common carrier, but on § 202 (and § 201)”
  • discussing the implications of the relaxation of the tariff-filing requirement
  • discussing the implications of the relaxation of the tariff-filing requirement
  • discussing the implications of the relaxation of the tariff-filing requirement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sentelle, Randolph, Rogers

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.