Skip to main content
· 2/20/1986

Orlando v. Herco, Inc.

Citations

  • 505 A.2d 308
  • 351 Pa. Super. 144
  • 42 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 1624
  • 1986 Pa. Super. LEXIS 9576

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • plaintiff required to show shrimp creole dish “was unfit for human consumption and, therefore, unmerchantable”
  • “[T]he fact that all other shrimp creole sold that evening, prepared at the same time and using common ingredients, was found to be fit for human consumption was a relevant fact for the jury to consider.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wieand, Olszewski, Watkins

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.