Skip to main content
· 8/5/2004

Orius Telecommunications, Inc. v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services

Citations

  • 857 A.2d 1061
  • 2004 D.C. App. LEXIS 417
  • 2004 WL 2035081

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting the ALJ's finding that employer/insurer had not \received proper notification of the compensation order\
  • referring to \the patchy record before us\ and \an important concession\ made during oral argument
  • referring to “the patchy record before us” and “an important concession” made during oral argument
  • noting the ALJ‟s finding that employer/insurer had not “received proper notification of the (continued…
  • “[T]he case could not have been sum ' totaled until the court ascertained when the ten-day time limit for payment began to run.”
  • court defers to factual determinations by DOES that “are supported by substantial evidence in the record”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ruiz, Washington, Kern

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.