· 8/5/2004
Orius Telecommunications, Inc. v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services
Citations
- 857 A.2d 1061
- 2004 D.C. App. LEXIS 417
- 2004 WL 2035081
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting the ALJ's finding that employer/insurer had not \received proper notification of the compensation order\
- referring to \the patchy record before us\ and \an important concession\ made during oral argument
- referring to “the patchy record before us” and “an important concession” made during oral argument
- noting the ALJ‟s finding that employer/insurer had not “received proper notification of the (continued…
- “[T]he case could not have been sum ' totaled until the court ascertained when the ten-day time limit for payment began to run.”
- court defers to factual determinations by DOES that “are supported by substantial evidence in the record”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ruiz, Washington, Kern
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.