Skip to main content
· 8/26/1998

Oriscar v. A ACCU Florida, Inc.

Citations

  • 715 So. 2d 1150
  • 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 10831
  • 1998 WL 537180

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that Rule 3.850 motion was not successive as previous motions either sought relief pursuant to Rule 3.800 or sought an extension of time to file a Rule 3.850 motion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cope, Jorgenson, Sorondo

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.