Skip to main content
· 6/2/1950

Oris Watch Co. v. United States

Citations

  • 24 Cust. Ct. 643
  • 1950 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2101

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting the “standard rule inferring concession from gaps in a plaintiffs opposition” to uphold district court’s acceptance of argument as conceded when plaintiff failed to respond to the argument

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lawrence

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.