Orion Technology, Inc. v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “prejudice (or injury) is a necessary element of standing”
• stating that to establish standing the bid protestor must show that it was an actual bidder and that it had a substantial chance of winning the contract
• applying substantial chance standard because agency’s evaluation provided “adequate factual predicate” to determine preju- dice
• applying the “substantial chance” test for prejudice where there was “an adequate factual predicate to ascertain under the traditional ‘substantial chance’ standard whether [the protestor] was prejudiced”
• reviewing the protestor’s exclusion from the competition by applying the arbitrary and capricious standard
• rejecting plaintiff’s argument “that the ‘non- trivial competitive injury’ standard should apply to this post-proposal, preevaluation protest” because that standard is simply “an exception to the general standing test in the case of pre-bid, pre-award protests”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).