Skip to main content
· 10/26/2000

Oriola v. Thaler

Citations

  • 100 Cal. Rptr. 2d 822
  • 84 Cal. App. 4th 397
  • 2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8598
  • 2000 Daily Journal DAR 11463
  • 2000 Cal. App. LEXIS 821

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting the difficulty posed by a lack of a statutory definition of “dating relationship” and looking to myriad factors considered by other states, including Rhode Island, to conclude that a dating relationship means a “serious courtship”
  • noting the difficulty posed by a lack of a statutory definition of \dating relationship\ and looking to myriad factors considered by other states, including Rhode Island, to conclude that a dating relationship means a \serious courtship\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kline

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.