Skip to main content
· 7/12/1976

Oringel v. Mathews

Citations

  • 534 F.2d 1182
  • 14 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 786
  • 1976 U.S. App. LEXIS 8077
  • 12 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 11,062

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that even though Georgia foreclosure confirmation proceeding has “peculiar procedural rules and serves a specialized function,” it does not preclude it from federal jurisdiction
  • agreeing that a confirmation proceeding conducted in federal court complies with the purposes of a similar proceeding in a state court
  • dicta intimating that in confirmation proceeding title is only affected where the court orders resale
  • District Court was an appropriate forum for a trustee in bankruptcy of mortgage corporation to confirm a Georgia foreclosure sale

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brown, Roney, Tuttle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.