Oribamie v. Santiago

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that practices “related to the privacy of confidential information” could not “satisfy the element of a threat to public health and safety, and, thus, cannot sustain a cause of action alleging a violation of Labor Law § 740”
• dismissing complaint where threatened conduct was not consummated because “there was no actual violation of any law, rule or regulation”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).