· 6/10/2013
Organic Seed Growers and Trade v. Monsanto Company
Citations
- 718 F.3d 1350
- 43 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20125
- 107 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1067
- 2013 WL 2460949
- 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 11601
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that pat-entee’s “representations unequivocally disclaiming] any intent to sue appellant” were “binding as a matter of judicial estop-pel”
- finding that a party’s “representations unequivocally disclaiming] any intent to sue appellants]” were, as a matter of judicial estoppel, sufficient to bind the representing party (emphasis added)
- finding that a party’s “representations unequivocally disclaim[ing] any intent to sue appellant[s]” were, as a matter of judicial estoppel, sufficient to bind the representing party (emphasis add- ed)
- finding that a party’s “representations unequivocally disclaim[ing] any intent to sue appellant[s]” were, as a matter of judicial estoppel, sufficient to bind the representing party (emphasis add- ed)
- equating a party’s repre- sentations to a covenant not to sue and mooting the action, despite the party not reducing the statements to writing
- equating a party’s representations to a covenant not to sue and mooting the action, despite the party not reducing the statements to writing
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Dyk, Bryson, Moore
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.