Orell v. UMass Memorial Medical Center, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that employer’s failure to make accommodations for employee’s disability and termination based on disability do not support a claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress
• dismissing claim brought directly under Article XVI, and not the MCRA
• allegations were sufficient to state a claim against plaintiff's supervisor individually for age and disability discrimination in violation of Chapter 151B
• lists factors considered in determining joint employer status, including who supervises, hires, and fires employees and who promulgates work rules and controls assignments for employees
• “Because plaintiff has failed to allege privity of contract between her and the defendants or that she was a third-party beneficiary to the contract . . . her breach of contract claims . . . will be dismissed.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).