· 8/27/1991
O'Reilly v. Allstate Insurance Co.
Citations
- 474 N.W.2d 221
- 1991 Minn. App. LEXIS 868
- 1991 WL 163091
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- rejecting claim that a theory was waived because it had not been specifically pleaded after the district court chose not to treat the claim as waived
- rejecting claim that a theory was waived because it had not been specifically pleaded after the district court chose not to treat the claim as waived
- extending delayed discovery rule in cases involving latent or progressive property damage
- trial court “could have treated [the insurer’s statute of limitations] defense as waived” where insurer “fail[ed] to notify [the insured] of its intent to rely on the contractual limitation period as a bar to her claim” in violation of the Unfair Claims Practices Act
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Klaphake, Lansing, Davies
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.