Skip to main content
· 8/27/1991

O'Reilly v. Allstate Insurance Co.

Citations

  • 474 N.W.2d 221
  • 1991 Minn. App. LEXIS 868
  • 1991 WL 163091

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting claim that a theory was waived because it had not been specifically pleaded after the district court chose not to treat the claim as waived
  • rejecting claim that a theory was waived because it had not been specifically pleaded after the district court chose not to treat the claim as waived
  • extending delayed discovery rule in cases involving latent or progressive property damage
  • trial court “could have treated [the insurer’s statute of limitations] defense as waived” where insurer “fail[ed] to notify [the insured] of its intent to rely on the contractual limitation period as a bar to her claim” in violation of the Unfair Claims Practices Act

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Klaphake, Lansing, Davies

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.