Oregonians against Ban on Nuclear Energy v. Myers

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “there is no need to prolong the 6 litigation by permitting further amendment” where the “basic flaw” in the 7 ||pleading cannot be cured by amendment
• noting that Fed. R.App. P. 10(e), authorizing appellate courts to supplement the record to correct omissions or misstatements, is not a vehicle for expanding the record
• noting that Fed. R.App. P. 10(e), authorizing appellate courts to supplement the record to correct omissions or misstatements, is not a vehicle for expanding the record
• noting neither party disputed that there was a Jones Act violation where the government provided untranslated Spanish language materials to the District Court
• noting “well-settled rule that parties are required to translate all foreign language documents into English”
• noting the “well-settled rule that parties are required to translate all foreign language documents into English”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).