· 10/16/1996
Oregonian Publishing Co. v. Portland School District No. 1J
Citations
- 925 P.2d 591
- 144 Or. App. 180
- 12 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 260
- 1996 Ore. App. LEXIS 1473
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that public interest particularly strong where public employees accused of misuse and theft of public property
- concluding that public interest particularly strong where public employees accused of misuse and theft of public property
- reviewing the record de novo and determining as a matter of law whether the requestor had timely filed its petition before the district attorney and whether the records at issue were statutorily exempt from disclosure
- alleged misuse and theft of public property by public employees was a matter of “legitimate” and “significant” public interest
- court considered fact of prior publicity in holding that records must be disclosed
- court consid- ered fact of prior publicity in holding that records must be disclosed
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Warren, Edmonds, Armstrong
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.