Skip to main content
· 10/16/1996

Oregonian Publishing Co. v. Portland School District No. 1J

Citations

  • 925 P.2d 591
  • 144 Or. App. 180
  • 12 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 260
  • 1996 Ore. App. LEXIS 1473

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that public interest particularly strong where public employees accused of misuse and theft of public property
  • concluding that public interest particularly strong where public employees accused of misuse and theft of public property
  • reviewing the record de novo and determining as a matter of law whether the requestor had timely filed its petition before the district attorney and whether the records at issue were statutorily exempt from disclosure
  • alleged misuse and theft of public property by public employees was a matter of “legitimate” and “significant” public interest
  • court considered fact of prior publicity in holding that records must be disclosed
  • court consid- ered fact of prior publicity in holding that records must be disclosed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Warren, Edmonds, Armstrong

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.