Oregon v. Robert K. Morrow, Inc. (In Re Belozer Farms, Inc.)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the contractual-versus-statutory distinction has not been followed by all courts and concluding that “the simple fact that an assessment is authorized by statute does not require a finding that it is ‘involuntary'”
• assessments imposed by state commodity on purchaser of fryer chickens were fees since agency used assessment for the primary benefit of payer, rather than general public
• assessments imposed on debtor by state fryer commission were collected in the interest of the general welfare of the producers of the commodity, not the interests of the public

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).