Oregon v. Hitchcock
Citations
- 202 U.S. 60
- 26 S. Ct. 568
- 50 L. Ed. 935
- 1906 U.S. LEXIS 1519
Syllabus
<p>Ill the absence of any act of Congress waiving immunity of the United States or consenting that it be sued in respect to swamp lands, either within or without an Indian reservation, or of any act of Congress assuming full responsibility in behalf of its wards, the Indians, affecting then-rights to such lands, this court has no jurisdiction of an action brought by a State against the Secretaiy of the Interior and Commissioner of the General Land Office to enjoin them from patenting to Indians lands within that State, claimed by the State under the swamp land acts.</p> <p>The fact that the action is brought by a State against the Secretary of the Interior, who is a citizen of a different State, does not give this Court jurisdiction as the real party in interest is the United States.</p> <p>It is not the province of the courts to interfere with the administration of the Land Department, and until the land is patented inquiry as to equitable rights comes within the cognizance of the Department and the courts will not anticipate its action. .</p>
Judges: Brewer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
57 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Affiliated Ute Citizens of Utah v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1972-06-12· cited 1,751×
- Larson v. Domestic and Foreign Commerce Corp.Supreme Court· 1949-10-10· cited 1,701×
- Land v. DollarSupreme Court· 1947-04-07· cited 1,339×
- Pennsylvania v. West VirginiaSupreme Court· 1923-06-11· cited 523×
- Minnesota v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1939-01-03· cited 519×
- Malone v. BowdoinSupreme Court· 1962-05-14· cited 328×
- Hawaii v. GordonSupreme Court· 1963-04-29· cited 284×
- The Chicago Junction CaseSupreme Court· 1924-03-03· cited 278×
- United States v. MeyerSeventh Circuit· 1940-06-12· cited 119×
- Twin Cities Chippewa Tribal Council v. Minnesota Chippewa TribeEighth Circuit· 1967-01-17· cited 81×
- United States Ex Rel. Goldberg v. DanielsSupreme Court· 1913-12-01· cited 80×
- Kansas v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1907-02-25· cited 78×
- California v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1979-02-22· cited 66×
- Naganab v. HitchcockSupreme Court· 1906-05-28· cited 63×
- Little v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1908-06-22· cited 38×
- Standard Oil Co. of California v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 1940-01-02· cited 34×
- State ex rel. Irvine v. District Court of Fourth Judicial Dist.Montana Supreme Court· 1951-12-20· cited 34×
- State of New Mexico v. BackerTenth Circuit· 1952-10-22· cited 24×
- United States v. Standard Oil Company of CaliforniaS.D. California· 1937-08-25· cited 23×
- Westbrook v. Director General of RailroadsN.D. Georgia· 1920-01-29· cited 18×
Cites
3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.