Oregon State Hospital v. Velasquez-Sanchez, Charly Josh (Alternative writ of mandamus issued)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a person sentenced to ten years probation by a Texas court would not be eligible for FFOA relief, and “[t]his difference in sentences is a rational basis for treating petitioner differently from an alien whose conviction is expunged under the FFOA.”
• holding that a person sentenced to ten years probation by a Texas court would not be eligible for FFOA relief, and \[t]his difference in sentences is a rational basis for treating petitioner differently from an alien whose conviction is expunged under the FFOA.\
• holding that a person sentenced to ten years probation by a Texas court would not be eligible for FFOA relief, and \[t]his difference in sentences is a rational basis for treating petitioner differently from an alien whose conviction is expunged under the FFOA.\
• holding that a person sentenced to ten years probation by a Texas court would not be eligible for FFOA relief, and “[t]his difference in sentences is a rational basis for treating petitioner differently from an alien whose conviction is expunged under the FFOA.”
• holding that a person sentenced to ten years probation by a Texas court would not be eligible for FFOA relief, and “[t]his difference in sentences is a rational basis for treating peti- tioner differently from an alien whose conviction is expunged under the FFOA.”
• holding that a person sentenced to ten years probation by a Texas court would not be eligible for FFOA relief, and “[t]his difference in sentences is a rational basis for treating peti- tioner differently from an alien whose conviction is expunged under the FFOA.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).