Skip to main content
· 4/13/1983

Oregon Shores Conservation Coalition v. Oregon Fish & Wildlife Commission

Citations

  • 662 P.2d 356
  • 62 Or. App. 481
  • 13 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20968
  • 1983 Ore. App. LEXIS 2552

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the term “necessary” expresses “non-completed legislation” that could be interpreted as “reasonably necessary” rather than “indispensable”
  • holding that the term \necessary\ expresses \non-completed legislation\ that could be interpreted as \reasonably necessary\ rather than \indispensable\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Richardson, Van Hoomissen Newman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.