· 4/13/1983
Oregon Shores Conservation Coalition v. Oregon Fish & Wildlife Commission
Citations
- 662 P.2d 356
- 62 Or. App. 481
- 13 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20968
- 1983 Ore. App. LEXIS 2552
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the term “necessary” expresses “non-completed legislation” that could be interpreted as “reasonably necessary” rather than “indispensable”
- holding that the term \necessary\ expresses \non-completed legislation\ that could be interpreted as \reasonably necessary\ rather than \indispensable\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Richardson, Van Hoomissen Newman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.