· 4/12/2000
Oregon Restaurant Ass'n v. City of Corvallis
Citations
- 999 P.2d 518
- 166 Or. App. 506
- 2000 Ore. App. LEXIS 619
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that a prohibition on smoking in all enclosed public places was upheld, notwithstanding the less extensive regulations of the Oregon Indoor Clean Air Act
- state’s “Indoor Clean Air Act” did not preempt municipal ordinance prohibiting smoking in enclosed public spaces within city when no inconsistency or conflict existed between Act and ordinance
- state’s “Indoor Clean Air Act” did not preempt municipal ordinance prohibiting smoking in enclosed public spaces within city when no clear inconsistency or conflict existed between Act and ordinance
- “[W]e are reluctant to assume that the legislature, in adopting statewide standards, intended to prohibit a locality from requiring more stringent limitations within its particular jurisdiction.”
- “[W]e are reluctant to assume that the legislature, in adopting statewide standards, intended to prohibit a locality from requiring more stringent limitations within its particular jurisdiction.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Edmonds, Deits, Armstrong
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.