Skip to main content
· 4/12/2000

Oregon Restaurant Ass'n v. City of Corvallis

Citations

  • 999 P.2d 518
  • 166 Or. App. 506
  • 2000 Ore. App. LEXIS 619

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that a prohibition on smoking in all enclosed public places was upheld, notwithstanding the less extensive regulations of the Oregon Indoor Clean Air Act
  • state’s “Indoor Clean Air Act” did not preempt municipal ordinance prohibiting smoking in enclosed public spaces within city when no inconsistency or conflict existed between Act and ordinance
  • state’s “Indoor Clean Air Act” did not preempt municipal ordinance prohibiting smoking in enclosed public spaces within city when no clear inconsistency or conflict existed between Act and ordinance
  • “[W]e are reluctant to assume that the legislature, in adopting statewide standards, intended to prohibit a locality from requiring more stringent limitations within its particular jurisdiction.”
  • “[W]e are reluctant to assume that the legislature, in adopting statewide standards, intended to prohibit a locality from requiring more stringent limitations within its particular jurisdiction.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Edmonds, Deits, Armstrong

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.