Oregon Occupational Safety & Health Division v. Tom O'Brien Construction Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• where excluded evidence had the tendency to rebut testimony of a witness for opposing party on which the ALJ expressly relied, the exclusion was prejudicial
• on judicial review of AL J’s order for the Workers’ Compensation Board, “we review the ALJ’s decision not to reopen the record for abuse of discretion,” citing OAR 438-85-0805

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).