Oregon Newspaper Publishers Ass'n v. Oregon Department of Corrections

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that if the rules “on their face comply with applicable constitutional and statutory requirements” then they must be challenged on an “as applied basis”
• if “rules on their face comply with applicable constitutional and statutory requirements *** any further challenge to them must be made on an ‘as applied’ basis”
• if rules “on their face comply with applicable constitutional and statutory requirements * * * any further challenge to them must be made on an ‘as applied’ basis”
• “The reviewing court examines the challenged rules only to determine whether those rules on their face comply with applicable constitutional and statutory requirements. If the rules comply, then any further challenge to them must be made on an ‘as applied’ basis.”
• “The reviewing court examines the challenged rules only to determine whether those rules on their face comply with applicable constitutional and statutory requirements. If the rules comply, then any further challenge to them must be made on an ‘as applied’ basis.”
• distinguishing facial and \as applied\ challenges to agency rules

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).