Oregon Natural Resources Council v. Thomas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that statutory language foreclosed challenges to agency actions on the basis of “[a]ll other applicable [fjederal environmental and natural resource laws”
• determining that statutory language provided for judicial review when an agency’s decision was “arbitrary and capricious or otherwise not in accordance with applicable law (other than those laws specified in subsection (i) lie., all federal environmental and natural resource laws]

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Other cases named Oregon Natural Resources Council v. Thomas

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• Oregon Natural Resources Council v. Thomas
  Ninth Circuit· 1996-07-31· cited 1×