Oregon ex rel. Kroger v. Johnson & Johnson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Holowecki did not abrogate Wilkerson’s requirement that a charge be verified, but plaintiff’s subsequent formal charge did not cure the earlier lack of verification
• considering EEOC charge to determine timeliness of filing without converting to motion for summary judgment
• considering EEOC charge to determine timeliness of filing without converting to motion for summary judgment
• considering EEOC charge to determine timeliness of filing without converting to motion for summary judgment
• “[T]he EEOC charge is a document that courts routinely consider when ruling on motions to dismiss, even if it is not attached to a pleading.”
• “the EEOC charge is a document that courts routinely consider when ruling on a motion to dismiss, even if it was not attached to the pleading”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).