O'Rear v. Bogie

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that claims concerning the amount of \antioxidants\ present in a beverage were nutrient content claims although \antioxidants\ are not nutrients specifically enunciated in Section 343(q)(1) or (q)(2)
• on their own, a “tad” and a “kiss” are “vague and non-specific terms that lack any clear, objective indication of their levels.”
• state law claims preempted where the plaintiff failed to allege she conducted a twelve-sample test
• tea beverage labeled as “just a tad sweet”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).