Skip to main content
· 8/13/1998

Ordonez v. MW McCurdy & Co., Inc.

Citations

  • 984 S.W.2d 264
  • 1998 Tex. App. LEXIS 4967
  • 1998 WL 470436

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • specifying objections to question as leading is an objection to form
  • “[T]he alleged spoliator may rebut the presumption by showing that the evidence in question was not destroyed with fraudulent intent or purpose.”
  • \[T]he alleged spoliator may rebut the presumption by showing that the evidence in question was not destroyed with fraudulent intent or purpose.\
  • “[T]he alleged spoliator may rebut the presumption by showing that the evidence in question was not destroyed with fraudulent intent or purpose.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mirabal, Wilson, Taft

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.