ORDONEZ OROSCO v. Napolitano

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that satisfaction of statutory prerequisites for U Visa does not automatically entitle an alien to certification
• stating that the LEC determination “is a classic example of a discretionary decision”
• finding that “the language of § 1184(p) makes it abundantly clear that the decision to issue a law enforcement certification [when applying for a U visa] is a discretionary one” and thus concluding that the district court correctly dismissed for lack of jurisdiction
• finding that “the language of § 1184(p) makes it abundantly clear that the decision to issue a law enforcement certification [when applying for a U visa] is a discretionary one” and thus concluding that the district court correctly dismissed for lack of jurisdiction
• “We think the language of § 1184(p) makes it abundantly clear that the decision to issue a [] certification is a discretionary one.”
• reviewing for standing de novo

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).