Skip to main content
· 7/19/1999

Ordner v. K-H Corp.

Citations

  • 74 F. Supp. 2d 150
  • 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20827
  • 1999 WL 1049353

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • on the defendant’s motion for summary judgment, holding that “[the] [p]laintiffs’ design defect claims may proceed to enforce the [HMR], leaving the preemption provisions of § 5125(b) inviolate”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lisi

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.