Orders v. Stotts

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that state law fraud claims were inappropriate for class treatment, citing Andrews
• declining to certify class where court would be required to “examine the representations made by each dealer and his/her employees to each claimant”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).