Skip to main content
· 12/6/2007

Orcutt v. Commissioner of Correction

Citations

  • 937 A.2d 656
  • 284 Conn. 724
  • 2007 Conn. LEXIS 508

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “in the absence of an articulation — which the appellant is responsible for obtaining — we presume that the trial court acted properly”
  • ‘‘in the absence of an articulation . . . [an appellate court will] presume that the trial court acted properly’’
  • ‘‘in the absence of an articulation . . . [an appellate court will] presume that the trial court acted properly’’
  • ‘‘in the absence of an articulation . . . [an appellate court will] presume that the trial court acted properly’’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Norcott, Katz, Palmer, Vertefeuille, Zarella

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.