Orca Communications v. Ann Noder Et vir/pitch Public

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the Arizona UTSA does not displace “common-law claims for misuse of confidential information that does not fall within AUTSA’s definition of ‘trade secret’”
• “It is not the function of the courts to rewrite statutes.” (quoting City of Phoenix v. Butler, 110 Ariz. 160, 162 (1973))
• “It is not the function of the courts to rewrite statutes.” (quoting City of Phoenix v. Butler, 110 Ariz. 160, 162 (1973))
• “[B]ecause [Plaintiff’s] unfair-competition claim, as alleged, is not limited to trade secrets, the superior court erred in dismissing that claim on preemption grounds.” (emphasis added)
• “The choice of the appropriate wording rests with the Legislature, and the court may not substitute its judgment for that of the Legislature.”
• in construing a uniform act statute, a court should consider decisions from other jurisdictions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).