Orb Factory, Ltd. v. Design Science Toys, Ltd.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “where proof of … disparity is not adequately provided, or does not exist, this is not a significant factor to be considered”
• noting that “where proof of … disparity is not adequately provided, or does not exist, this is not a significant factor to be considered”
• holding transfer unwarranted where deposition testimony is “an available alternative to live testimony”
• noting an “extra hour’s drive does not warrant transfer of this case”
• locus of operative facts weighed against transfer where “a substantial portion of the wrongful acts ... occurred in the Southern District, namely at a Toy Fair in New York City” and “conduct and activities in the Southern District are key elements of [plaintiffs] case”
• locus of operative facts weighed against transfer where “a substantial portion of the wrongful acts . . . occurred in the Southern District, namely at a Toy Fair in New York City” and “conduct and activities in the Southern District are key elements of [plaintiff’s] case”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).