Oravec v. Sunny Isles Luxury Ventures, L.C.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the “substantial similarity analysis must focus on similarity of expression, i.e., material susceptible of copyright protection”
• explaining that the similarity inquiry targets the similarity between the protectable expression of a copyrighted work and the expression in an allegedly infringing work
• explaining that the similarity inquiry targets the similarity between the protectable expression of a copyrighted work and the expression in an allegedly infringing work
• explaining that the similarity inquiry targets the similarity between the protectable expression of a copyrighted work and the expression in an allegedly infringing work
• noting that where disputed issues of fact are found to exist as to whether certain defendants had access to the plaintiff's designs, summary judgment turned on the issue of substantial similarity
• noting that Rule 16’s good cause standard requires a showing of diligence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).