Skip to main content
· 5/22/1984

Orantes v. State

Citations

  • 452 So. 2d 68

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the rule announced in King did not apply when the evidence showed that a non-government agent conspired to commit all the elements of the charged offense
  • holding that the rule announced in King did not apply when the evidence showed that a non- government agent conspired to commit all the elements of the charged offense

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nimmons

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.