ORANGE COUNTY SCHOOL BD. v. Best

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• referring to subsection two as having “no practical effect until after the two-year period provided for in section 440.19(1
• explaining section 440.19(2) extends rather than shortens limitation period described in section 440.19(1), and if PFB is timely under section 440.19(1) or section 440.19(2) there is no bar to compensation
• explaining section 440.19(2) extends rather than shortens limitation period described in section 440.19(1), and if PFB is timely under section 440.19(1) or section 440.19(2) there is no bar to compensation
• explaining section 440.19(2) extends rather than shortens limitation period described in section 440.19(1), and if petition for benefits is timely under section 440.19(1) or section 440.19(2) there is no bar to compensation
• “A petition is timely if filed within two years of the date of accident or, even thereafter, if filed within one year of the last date the petitioner received medical treatment or indemnity benefits.”
• “The question is whether the statute bars a petition for benefits filed within two years of an industrial accident where more than a year has elapsed since ‘the furnishing of remedial treatment’” (emphasis supplied)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).