Orange County Board of Public Instruction v. Brown

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the Board permissibly expounded upon court-ordered no-contact-with-minors probation condition by imposing a condition of supervision prohibiting Elliott from entering or loitering within 1,000 feet of areas with a primary activity involving people under the age of 18
• holding that the Board permissibly expounded upon court-ordered no-contact-with-minors probation condition by imposing a condition of supervision prohibiting Elliott from entering or loitering within 1,000 feet of areas with a primary activity involving people under the age of 18
• stating that “a trial -7- J-A10030-15 court may impose conditions of probation in a generalized manner[]”
• observing that when the General Assembly uses different words or phrases in a statutory provision, a presumption arises that the legislative body intended those words or phrases to have different meanings
• observing that when the General Assembly uses different words or phrases in a statutory provision, a presumption arises that the legislative body intended those words or phrases to have different meanings
• stating: (1) probation offices may “impose conditions of supervision that are germane to, elaborate on, or interpret any conditions of probation that are imposed by the trial court[;]” and (2

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).