Skip to main content
· 3/19/1993

Oramas v. State

Citations

  • 615 So. 2d 853
  • 1993 WL 75803

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a rule 3.850 motion is facially insufficient where it is based on facts contained in an unsworn memorandum of law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.