Skip to main content
· 1/20/1987

Oral-B Laboratories, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, Cross v. Mi-Lor Corporation, a Massachusetts Corporation, Cross

Citations

  • 810 F.2d 20
  • 1 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1867
  • 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 1260

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Evidence of conscious imitation is pertinent because the law presumes that an intended similarity is likely to cause confusion.”
  • “If an employee can show that the agency knew that the 25 reason for the threatened removal could not be substantiated, the threatened action by 26 the agency is purely coercive.”
  • “If an employee can show that the agency knew 14 that the reason for the threatened removal could not be substantiated, the threatened 15 action by the agency is purely coercive.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Feinberg, Winter, Mansfield

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.