O'QUINN v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• mere presence, even when coupled with suspicion, is not sufficient to authorize a conviction without any evidence to show participation of defendant in illegal act

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Johnson v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2006-02-06· cited 30×
• Muckle v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1983-03-08· cited 21×
• Thomas v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1997-05-13· cited 19×
• Fitz v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1991-09-03· cited 12×
• McGuire v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1993-07-16· cited 11×
• Hazelrig v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1984-09-05· cited 9×
• Willis v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1994-09-16· cited 8×
• Brazle v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1996-11-12

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Riley v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1907-04-25· cited 78×
• Pedigo v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 1898-01-22· cited 64×
• Sprouse v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 1909-02-26· cited 23×
• MacH v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1964-02-14· cited 22×
• Rutland v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1933-01-25· cited 20×
• Aiken v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1913-10-31· cited 18×
• Rodgers v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1958-02-07· cited 14×
• Huncke v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1976-01-19· cited 14×
• Worley v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1955-03-17· cited 13×
• Mealor v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1975-04-16· cited 9×