Skip to main content
· 3/30/1908

O'Quin v. Russell

Citations

  • 121 La. 57
  • 46 So. 100
  • 1908 La. LEXIS 631

Syllabus

<p>1. Evidence — Paeol Evidence.</p> <p>Parol evidence is inadmissible to prove a transfer of real estate, or to take the debt of a ■deceased person out of prescription.</p> <p>[Ed. Note. — For cases in point, see Cent. Dig. vol. 20, Evidence, §§ 548-555.]</p> <p>■2. Same.</p> <p>But such evidence may be received to defeat a demand for fruit and revenues of real estate.</p> <p>[Ed. Note. — For cases in point, see Cent. Dig. vol. 20, Evidence, §§ 548-555.]</p> <p>(Syllabus by the Court.)</p>

Judges: Provosty

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.