Opulent Life Church v. City of Holly Springs

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that, “[w]hether frivolous or not,” the argument that plaintiff’s “‘long litigation delay’ suggests it is not suffering irreparable harm” is “unconvincing on these facts”
• concluding that a city’s repeal of an ordinance the night before oral argument did not moot the plaintiff’s challenges to the ordinance
• holding that while states may not be held liable for money damages under RLUIPA, municipalities and counties may
• holding that a 4 Case No. 22-5391, Be the Bush Recovery Ministries v. Coffee Cnty., Tenn. claim under the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act sustained a presumption of irreparable injury
• explaining that the Eleventh Circuit test “treats all land use regulations that facially differentiate between religious and nonreligious institutions as violations of the Clause.”
• explaining that “[a] plaintiff seeking both injunctive relief and money damages can continue to pursue the case, even after the request for an equitable remedy is rendered moot”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).