Optimization Consulting, Inc. v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• requiring proof the agency relied on the false statement in order to establish a claim of material misrepresentation
• “[T]he submission of a misstatement, as made in the instant procurement, which materially influences consideration of a proposal should disqualify the proposal.”
• “[T]he submission of a misstatement, as made in the instant procurement, which materially influences consideration of a proposal should disqualify the proposal.”
• “[T]he submission of a misstatement, as made in the instant procurement, which materially influences consideration of a proposal should disqualify the proposal.” (quoting Plan. Rsch. Corp., 971 F.2d at 741)
• “[T]he submission of a misstatement, as made in the instant procurement, which materially influences consideration of a proposal should disqualify the proposal.” (quoting Plan. Rsch. Corp., 971 F.2d at 741)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).