Optic Pub. Co. v. Board of Com'rs
Citations
- 27 N.M. 371
- 202 P. 124
Syllabus
<p>SYLLABUS BY THE COURT.</p> <p>1. Chapter 108, Laws 1909, does not permit the rendition of a judgment against a county for current expenses, where, as here, the complaint shows on its face that the claim on which the judgment is sought has been allowed by the county commissioners, and payment denied or refused because there are no funds for the payment of such claim. . P. 373</p> <p>2. Chapter 108, Laws 1909, does not repeal the Bateman Act (Code 1915, §§ 1227 to 1233, inclusive). James v. County Commissioners, 24 N. M. 509, 174 Pac. 1001, followed. P. 373</p>
Judges: Davis, Parker, Raynolds
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.